Congratulations Kerry,

Firstly for having the guts to publish a forecast and secondly for owning up to the fact you stuffed up not the methodolgy.

I wonder how many "Traders" actually traded the forecast after checking what you had said was in sync with K Theory?

Forecasting is one thing knowing how to trade the forecast is another thing entirely.

Mistakes, I love 'em they are very cheap lessons.

Knockers are only sound generators so the occupants know there are Barbarians at the gate.......

Love your work

Regards
LPP
 

Kerry,
Don't feel too bad... to err is human - to forgive divine. Obviously astroisforretards has never never ever made a mistake ?.. Get over it or else move on!
Kerry, don't be put off by this naysayer.
Best regards

TS
 

Regarding the first comment, since when does anyone else always get everything perfect, and then on the first time? So what if Kerry made a mistake. It happens from time to time, just as like the rest of us.

It is easy for those to deny what they do not understand. Kerry's research is built upon 40 plus years, and if anyone thinks they can do better, how about proving it?

I tell you, why don't you pick the winners to a horse race, the days the stock market goes up and do that for everyday for a month and then compare your best with Kerry's method and see just what your talking about.

I have already put all this to the test, and it maybe difficult to explain all of this here, but I want everyone else to know, the Kerry Theory works, and it's repeatable, unlike the individual whom happens to have a real issue on life in general.

Also, Kerry isn't exectly doing the same thing as traditional astrology, as anyone knowing astrology would be able to tell you this. Her Kerry Theory is much more on target than the random experiences associated with traditional methods.

It's amazing how someone can think to cruel in thought to shut down others just for their own lack and understanding. I am sure the individual cannot do the Kerry Theory, or explain it.

Let us all not allow such individuals like this to keep us like in North Korea isolated from the truth. The access to information is something the US citizen can be proud of, allowing everyone more opportunity to achieve more success.

Was Rome built in a day? How can anyone judge Kerry, when they themselves are not able to offer and do what Kerry has been doing and shares this with everyone else?

The world is not flat or the center of the Universe as the Church told us before. This attack on Kerry for her mistake reflects nothing more than for those to put to the test her "Kerry Theory" and see for themselves...

I have no doubts it works, it's only a matter of creating a faster more accurate method using the math, such as a computer software program.

Enough said...
 

astroisforretards, as you appear to be aligning yourself with a 'scientific view' in yr criticism, I will refer you firstly to a quote by Thomas Reider, author of Sunspots,Stars and the Stock Market (1979); "I see astrology as merely one more area where alleged correlations or "influences" invite the clear minded investigations of those who have been taught the scientific method as it is practiced today. Indeed, I perceive the tendency among all too many scientists to reject the subject out of hand, as an abandonment of the scientific method!. .... Indeed, I have never heard of any person who, after making a personal investigation of the subject of astrology, remained the skeptic he was originally." and secondly to another by the great 19th century philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860); "There are three steps in the revelation of any truth: in the first, it is ridiculed; in the second, resisted; in the third, it is considered self-evident."

TS
 

Well astroisforretards, you certainly are predictable in your responses ... lol... and already SHOUTING!
I suspect that given a hundred good calls you would demand a thousand. So be it.

TS
 

astroisforretards said 'This will be the LAST TIME I respond to this blog'.... (plus a lot more).
I will be brief and simply say 'Thank you!'

TS
 

I've been looking at all of the statements and I think the Astroisforretards guy was a bit on the harsh side to begin with and needs to keep his opinions shorter, but I can't honestly see much wrong with his reasoning. To the TS man or woman, I think you are just bitter because you aren't smart enough to argue with him and he was right about you not being able to resist writing again.

Kerry Baidin, thanks for what you are doing. I don't care if you are right or wrong. You've got a lot of guts to do what you are doing and are not sinking to this level of bitching.
 

To the previous poster, which part of the following by astroisforetards did you think was sound reasoning?
"AstroIsForRetards said...
I guess you'll be withdrawing all your crappy books from sale now and publically admitting how ridiculous belief in astrology is? No? Didn't think so, yet there couldn't be better proof than your call for today about how much bullshit it really is. Oh and just in case you think you can erase your market call and hide it from view, I've taken the liberty of recording the screen and will show everyone I know in the trading community. Shocked at this? You shouldn't be. Surely you could have seen it in the stars?"

However I agree with you that Kerry is to be applauded.
 

To the previous poster: I did say that I thought he was harsh (read my opening line again), but most of the stuff in the posts after that were very reasonable and logical. Even although he was very rude in that passage you quoted and agree that this was definitely unreasonable, he was right about Kerry making a mistake. Just because she is obviously a very kind person does not mean that we should automatically accept everything she says and dismiss what he says. Do not mistake this as me siding with him, because I'm not! What I do advocate is critical thinking and not blind following.
 

I think Kerry's theory is very nice.
 

I've read all of this thread and think the Astro4retards person is the only one with sense. I also think he's an arrogant asshole!

All Kerry had to do was to make some more predictions and get over 90% of them right for this to be taken seriously. The whole blog seems to have dried up and I think its just another bunch of bollocks. Where's the proof Kerry?
 

"...I could use a program like Tradestation to go over a years worth of market data and it would then retro fit the best technical indicator to use during this time..."

It's quite ironic that I have come across K Theory. You see, I have been involved with writing many of the Technical Analysis engines that people can find around the world (Reuters Graphics, Metastock, Telerate/Active8 & Webstation, Athena). I am also VERY conversant with the likes of Tradstation and Aspen Graphics.
Chest beating aside, there are a few important points that EVERYONE needs to know:

i) Fitting a mathematic model that ideally suits Past Trends is easy. Most of the above mentioned charing applications have facilities to best recognise tradable 'patterns'.

ii) Traders do NOT use (for the most part) TA (Technical Analysis). A Good trader _knows_ where the price is. A Great trader is only right up to 70% of the time (on average).

iii) When people use Past trends to 'predict' what is going to happen, it will only work when there is no-one else using the same or similar trading practice.

For example: The Indian market is blossoming. Currently, you can use TA (technical analysis) on virtually ALL stocks within india to trade...and make lots of money.
However, once the traders start getting a 'feel' for their stocks, TA will start to deteriorate into something that the West has (which is: Good Luck on finding a trading strategy).
The West generally use Fundamental Analysis for 'predictions'. (ie If it rains too much in Chile, then crop XYZ's yield won't be as high, which means that Company ABC will go up/down).

I am very interested in K Theory and would love to have the time to Develop an analysis to plug into one of the above systems. Hopefully I do find the time, because this may well be relatively important.

Note again however, that by having K Theory available in the public domain, then the effectiveness of the responses will be limited.
That is, if EVERYONE knows that Company ABC will go up tomorrow, then I should buy today! Such logic then leads to it's own sub-trends...
Eg. If K Theory says ABC goes up on Thursday, then the price will skyrocket the day or so before, so I should buy 2 days before K Theory indicates I should....etc.

So obviously, from a predictave point of view for K Theory to have any chance of long term success:
a) It shouldn't be revealed to anyone. Ooops, Too Late!!!
b) Any strategies using the calculations of purely a +ve/+ve trends would need to include a 'number of days lead time'. Giving your self that 2 day head start on the buy/sell rush.
c) A third strategy might be to watch for the K Theory +ve/-ve in a combined manner and then choose a strategy where you buy at the midpoint of the two...

If I ever _do_ create a strategy, I will not post it here (for obvious reasons), however, I will gladly pass it on to the creator of this theory, as all credit should go to them.
 

Oh boy, just read this thread... astroisforretards said 'I trade with 100% accuracy and am nowhere near being great.'
Roflmao, what a load of crap! How many trades did you make to score 100%? One? Let me guess.. you got lucky with that one and haven't made any more so you can claim 100% success most likely!
100% accurate trader? yeah, right... you're full of it mate.
 

Hi Anonymous,

Its Astroisforretards here. Its been so long and I have forgotten my log in name. Its nice to see how all you did was illuminate your own ignorance by attempting to mock, yet not actually picking holes in the logic I expressed so eloquently. Is it possible that all you are is yet another idiot believer, who is unable to actually participate in proper debate? It sure seems that way because all you did was show what a fool you are!

Ok, here's the deal: I make 100% successful trades on the Forex market, using economic news releases as a catalyst for taking advantage of market surprise when the actual figures are significantly off from the consensus. Did you understand that? Probably not. The point is that the good reports do not happen very often and so I do not get much opportunity to trade, but the fact remains that I DO make 100% WHEN I trade. You can laugh and scoff all you like; unlike your clear belief in this pile of shit 'theory', my trading record is an absolute, incontestable FACT. There is an unbridgeable gulf between my FACT and Kerry's, ahem, theory. You can laugh all you like pal, but I am the one with the last laugh. Next time you come on, please try to actually have an argument or once again I will show up you and your worm-like ilk for the morons that you are.